SIEM tricks: dealing with delayed events in Splunk

tiSo after bugging the entire IT department and interrogating as many business teams as possible to grant you (the security guy) access to their data, you are finally in the process of developing your dreamed use cases. Lucky you!

Most SIEM projects already fall apart before reaching that stage. Please take the time to read a nicely written article by SIEM GM Anton Chuvakin. In case you don’t have the time, just make sure you check the section on “Mired in Data Collection”.

The process of conceptualizing, developing, deploying and testing use cases is challenging and should be continuous. There are so many things to cover, I bet you can always find out something is missing while reading yet another “X ways to screw up a SIEM” article.

So here’s another idea to prove it once again: how can you make sure the events are safely arriving at your DB or index? Or even beyond: how can you make sure the timestamps are being parsed or extracted appropriately? Why is it important?

Time is what keeps everything from happening at once.

First of all, I’m assuming the Splunk terminology here, so it’s easier to explain by example. Also, let’s make two definitions very clear:

Extracted time:  corresponding to the log generation time, coming from the log event itself. This one is usually stored as _time field in Splunk.

Index time: corresponding to the event indexing time, generated by Splunk indexer itself upon receiving an event. This one is stored as _indextime field in Splunk.

There are infinite reasons why you should make sure timestamps are properly handled during extraction or searching time, but here are just a few examples:

  1. Timezones: this piece of data is not always part of the logs. So time values from different locations may differ – a lot;
  2. Realtime/Batch processing: not all logs are easily collected near realtime. Sometimes they are collected in hourly or daily chunks;
  3. Correlation Searches (Rules) and forensic investigations are pretty much relying on the Extracted Time. Mainly because that’s the default behavior, either from the Time Picker (Search GUI) or the Rule editor.

Have you noticed the risk here?

Going under the radar

In case you haven’t figured out yet, apart from all other effects of not getting events’ time right, there’s a clear risk when it comes to security monitoring (alerting): delayed events may go unnoticed.

If you are another “realtime freak”, running Correlation Searches every 5 minutes, you are even more prone to this situation. Imagine the following: you deploy a rule (R1) that runs every 5 minutes, checking for a particular scenario (S1) within the last 5 minutes, and firing an alert whenever S1 is found.

For testing R1, you intentionally run a procedure or a set of commands that trigger the occurrence of S1. All fine, an alert is generated as expected.

Since correlation searches and, in fact, any search, scheduled or not, runs based on Extracted Time (_time) by default, supposing that S1 events are delayed by 5 minutes, those events will never trigger an alert from R1. Why?

Because the 5-minute window checked by the continuous, scheduled R1 will never re-scan the events from a previous, already checked window. The moment those delayed events are known to exist (indexed), R1 is already set to check another time window, therefore, missing the opportunity to detect S1 behavior from delayed events.

What can be done?

There are many ways to tackle this issue but regardless of which one is chosen, you should make sure the _time field is extracted correctly – it doesn’t matter if the event arrives later or not.

Clock skew monitoring dashboard

The clock skew problem here applies to the difference between Indexed (_indextime) and Extracted (_time) values. Assuming near realtime data collection, those values tend to be very close, which implies it’s completely fine to have them out of sync.

Folks at Telenor CERT were kind enough to allow me to share a slightly simplified version of a dashboard we’ve written that is used to monitor for this kind of issue, we call it “Event Flow Tracker”.

The code is available at Github and is basically a SimpleXML view, based on default fields (metadata). It should render well once it’s deployed to any search head.

Here’s a screenshot:

eft1

Since searches rely on metadata (tstats based), it runs pretty fast, and also tracks the event count (volume) and reporting agents (hosts) over time. Indexes are auto-discovered from a REST endpoint call, but the dashboard can also be extended or customized for specific indexes or source types.

When clicking at “Show charts” link under Violations highlighted in red, the following line charts are displayed:

eft2

So assuming a threshold of one hour (positive/negative), with the visualizations it’s easier to spot scenarios when those time fields are too different from each other.

The first chart shows how many events are actually under/above the threshold. The second chart depicts how many seconds those events are off in average.

How to read the charts?

Basically, assuming median as the key metric, in case the blue line (median) is kept steady above the green line (threshold), it might be related to a recurring, constant issue that should be investigated.

Since the dashboard is based on regular queries, those can be turned into alerts in case you want to systematically investigate specific scenarios. For example, for events that must follow strict time settings.

The dashboard is not yet using the base search feature, so perhaps it’s something you could consider in case you want to use or improve it.

Writing Rules – Best practices

Now, assuming the risk is known, that is, some events may land on the indexers a bit later due to a transport bottleneck (network, processing queue, etc), how to write reliable rules?

Delayed detection?

If data is not there yet, how can you reliably detect anything? This is an obvious decision. You should always consider capturing as much signal as you can in order to trigger a high-quality alert.

If you are into “realtime detection”, I suggest you consider checking how many events you might have missed due to this problem (delayed events). I’m more into detecting something with accuracy, even if a bit delayed, rather than trying to detect something almost immediately risking less accuracy or even the lack of alerting.

Also, depending on your search query (density, constraints, etc), you may gain some extra resource power by increasing the interval and time boundaries from your rules.

As a side note: reports say organizations take days if not months to detect a breach, but some insist on realtime detection. Is that what Mr. Trump tried to convey here?

Time boundaries based on Index Time?

Yes, that’s also an option. You can search based on _indextime. So basically, as soon as the event is indexed, no matter how off the Extracted time (_time) is, it may be consider for an alert.

The downside of it, besides adding more complexity when troubleshooting Throttling/Suppression, is that you need to carefully review all your drilldown searches from another perspective, taking _indextime into account. In other words, the searches should always specify _index_earliest and _index_latest. More info here.

References

Event indexing delay
http://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/6.5.1/Troubleshooting/Troubleshootingeventsindexingdelay

Splunk/ES: dynamic drilldown searches

72345577One of the advantages of Splunk is the possibility to customize pretty much anything in terms of UI/Workflow. Below is one example on how to make dynamic drilldown searches based on the output of aggregated results (post-stats).

Even though Enterprise Security (ES) comes with built-in correlation searches (rules), some mature/eager users leverage Splunk’s development appeal and write their own rules based on their use cases and ideas, especially if they are already familiar with SPL.

Likewise, customizing “drilldown searches” is also possible, enabling users to define their own triage workflows, facilitating investigation of notable events (alerts).

Workflow 101: Search > Analytics > Drilldown

Perhaps the simplest way to define a workflow in ES is by generating alerts grouped by victim or host and later being able to quickly evaluate all the details, down to the RAW events related to a particular target scenario.

As expected, there are many ways to define a workflow, here’s a short summary of the stages listed above:

Search: here you define your base search, applying as many filters as possible so that only relevant data is processed down the pipe. Depending on how dense/rare your search is, enrichment and joins can also be done here.

Analytics: at this stage you should get the most out of stats() command. By using it you systematically aggregate and summarize the search results, which is something desirable given that every row returned will turn into a new notable event.

Drilldown: upon generating a notable event, the user should be able to quickly get to the RAW events building up the alert, enabling rapid assessment without exposing too many details for analysis right from the alert itself.

You may also want to craft a landing page (dashboard) from your drilldown search string, enabling advanced workflows such as Search > Analytics > Custom Dashboard (Dataviz, Enrichment) > RAW Events > Escalation (Case Management).

Example: McAfee ePO critical/high events

Taking McAfee’s endpoint security solution as an example (fictitious data, use case), here’s how a simple workflow would be built based on a custom correlation search that looks for high-severity ePO events.

First, the base search:

index=main sourcetype=mcafee:epo (severity=critical OR severity=high)

Next, using stats command to aggregate and summarize data, grouping by host:

| stats values(event_description) AS desc, values(signature) AS signature, values(file_name) AS file_path, count AS result BY dest

The above command is also performing some (quick) normalization to allow proper visualization within ES’ Incident Review dashboard, and also providing some quick statistics to facilitate the alert evaluation (event count, unique file names, etc).

Finally, it’s time for defining the dynamic drilldown search string based on the output of those two commands (search + stats):

| eval dd="index=main sourcetype=mcafee:epo (severity=critical OR severity=high) dest=".dest

Basically, the eval command is creating a new field/column named “dd” to store the exact search query needed to search for ePO events for a given host (dest).

In the end, putting it all together:

out1

Despite having more than 150 matching events (result) from each of those hosts, the maximum number of alerts that can be possibly generated over each correlation search execution is limited to the number of unique hosts affected.

And here’s how that translates into a correlation search definition:

cs1

cs2

Note that the “Drill-down search” value is based on a token expansion: search $dd$. This way, the value of “dd” is used to dynamically build the drilldown link.

Now, once the correlation search generates an alert, a link called “Search for raw events” should become available under “Contributing Events” after expanding the notable event details at the Incident Review dashboard.

By clicking the link, the user is directed to a new search containing all raw events for the specific host, within the same time window used by the correlation search:

cs4

Defining a “dd” field within your code is not only enabling custom dashboards development with easy access to the drilldown search (index=notable) but also standardizing the value for the drilldown search at the correlation search definition.

As always, the same drilldown search may be triggered via a Workflow Actions. Feel free to get in touch in case you are interested in this approach as well.

Happy Splunking!

 

Honing in on the Homeless – the Splunkish way

e9038252f910c840e582818a63dd9908_400x400Have you noticed Splunk just released a new version, including new data visualizations? I had been eager to start playing with one of the new charts when yesterday I came across a blog post by Bob Rudis, who is co-author of the Data-Driven Security Book and former member of the Verizon’s DBIR team.

In that post, @hrbrmstr is presenting readers with a dataviz challenge based on data from U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) related to homeless population estimates. So I’ve decided to give it a go with Splunk.

Even though -we can’t compare- the power of R and other Stats/Dataviz focused programming languages with current Splunk programming language (SPL), this exercise may serve to demonstrate some of the capabilities of Splunk Enterprise.

Sidenote: In case you are into Machine Learning (ML) and Splunk, it’s also worth checking the new ML stuff just released along with Splunk 6.4, including the awesome ML Toolkit showcase app.

The challenge is basically about asking insightful, relevant questions to the HUD data sets and generating visualizations that would help answering those questions.

What the data sets can tell about the homeless population issue?

The following are the questions I try to answer,  considering the one proposed in the challenge post: Which “states” have the worst problem in terms of homeless people?

  1. Which states currently have the largest homeless population per capita?
  2. Which states currently have the largest absolute homeless population?
  3. Which states are being successful or failing on lowering the figures compared to previous years?

I am far from considering myself a data scientist (was looking up standard deviation formula the other day), but love playing with data like many other Infosec folks in our community. So please take it easy with newbies!

Since we are dealing with data points representing estimates and this is a sort of experiment/lab, take them with a grain of salt and consider adding “according to the data sets…here’s what that Splunk guy verified” to the statements found here.

Which states currently have the largest homeless population per capita?

For this one, it’s pretty straightforward to go with a Column chart for quick results. Another approach would be to gather map data and work on a Choropleth chart.

Basically, after calculating the normalized values (homeless/100k population), I filter in only the US states making the top of the list, limiting to 10 values . They are then sorted by values from year 2015 and displayed on the chart below:

homeless-ratio

Homeless per 100k of population – Top 10 US states

The District of Columbia clearly stands out, followed by Hawaii and New York. That’s one  I would never guess. But there seems to be some explanation for it.

Which states currently have the largest absolute homeless population?

In this case, only the homeless figures are considered for extracting the top 10 states. Below are the US states where most homeless population lives based on latest numbers (2015), click to enlarge.

homeless-abs

Homeless by absolute values – Top 10 US states

As many would guess, New York and California are leading here. Those two states along with Florida and Texas are clearly making the top of the list since 2007.

Which states are being successful or failing on lowering the figures compared to previous years?

Here we make use of a new visualization called Horizon chart. In case you are not familiar with this one, I encourage you to check this link where everything you need to know about it is carefully explained.

Basically, it eases the challenge of visualizing multiple (time) series with less space (height) by using layered bands with different color codes to represent relative positive/negative values, and different color shades (intensity) to represent the actual measured values (data points).

After crafting the SPL query, here’s the result (3 bands, smoothed edges) for all 50 states plus DC, present in the data sets:

horizon-chart

So how to read this visualization? Keep in mind the chart is based on the same prepared data used in the first chart (homeless/100k population).

The red color means the data point is higher when compared to the previous measurement (more homeless/capita), whereas the blue represents a negative difference when comparing current and last measurements (less homeless/capita). This way, the chart also conveys trending, possibly uncovering the change in direction over time.

The more intense the color is, the higher the (absolute) value. You can also picture it as a stacked area chart without needing extra height for rendering.

The numbers listed at the right hand side represent the difference between immediate data points point in the timeline (current/previous). For instance, last year’s ratio (2015) for Washington decreased by ~96 as compared to the previous year (2014).

On a Splunk dashboard or from the search query interface (Web GUI), there’s also an interactive line that displays the relative values as the user hovers over a point in the timeline, which is really handy (seen below).

horizon_crop

The original data files are provided below and also referenced from the challenge’s blog and GitHub pages. I used a xlsx2csv one-liner before handling the data at Splunk (many other ways to do it though).

HUD’s homeless population figures (per State)
US Population (per State)

The Splunk query used to generate the data used as input for the Horizon chart is listed below. It seems a bit hacky, but does the job well without too much effort.

| inputlookup 2007-2015-PIT-Counts-by-State.csv
| streamstats last(eval(case(match(Total_Homeless, "Total"), Total_Homeless))) as _time_Homeless
| where NOT State_Homeless="State"
| rex mode=sed field=_time_Homeless "s|(^[^\d]+)(\d+)|\2-01-01|"
| rename *_Homeless AS *
| join max=0 type=inner _time State [
  | inputlookup uspop.csv
  | table iso_3166_2 name
  | map maxsearches=51 search="
    | inputlookup uspop.csv WHERE iso_3166_2=\"$iso_3166_2$\"
    | table X*
    | transpose column_name=\"_time\"
    | rename \"row 1\" AS \"Population\"
    | eval State=\"$iso_3166_2$\"
    | eval Name=\"$name$\"
  "
  | rex mode=sed field=_time "s|(^[^\d]+)(\d+)|\2-01-01|"
]
| eval _time=strptime(_time, "%Y-%m-%d&amp")
| eval ratio=round((100000*Total)/Population)
| chart useother=f limit=51 values(ratio) AS ratio over _time by Name

Want to check out more of those write-ups? I did one in Portuguese related to Brazil’s Federal Budget application (also based on Splunk charts). Perhaps I will update this one soon with new charts and a short English version.

Blame it on YOU for the damn false-positives!

indexBelow  is a list of 6 facts (and counting) you should know before whining and complaining around the infamous false-positive (FP) topic. If you’ve been there, feel free to comment and share your pain or your own facts.

As you know, the FPs are everywhere and multiplying just like Gremlins after a shower! [Misled Millennials, click here] In fact, that seems to be part of 12 in every 10 Security Monitoring projects out there, including those heavily relying on SIEM technology.

So here’s the list of facts and some quick directions:

#1 Canned content sucks

Bad news. Out-of-the-box things don’t go well with Security Monitoring, my friend. Your adversaries are quite creative and you need to catch up.

But before bashing  vendors, think about it from their perspective. Would you release a product without any content? They are there for providing an idea of its usage, they are meant for general cases. You need to RTFM and spend a great deal of time evaluating and testing the product features to enable customization.

If you are into #photography, let me ask you: are you still shooting on automatic, generating JPEGs, with lower resolution (more shots!) out of your fully customizable camera? If you want to boost your chances of having that perfect shot, you need to go manual and experiment with all possible settings.

The technology is just another tool. Regardless of the feature set, you should be able to get the best out of it by translating your knowledge into a tailor-made rule set.

#2 You don’t have a scope

Since it’s pretty much utopia consuming a risk analysis result as an input for your Security Monitoring program, you need to find a way to define an initial scope. This will drive the custom rules development cycle and define the monitoring coverage (detective controls).

We tend to go with low hanging fruits or quick wins, but even then, you still need to spend some time defining your goals. And here the “Use Cases” conversation starts, perhaps one of the most important from the program!

Actually, it deserves a full article on its own, but I will leave you with a simple, yet interesting approach delivered by Augusto Barros (Gartner). I liked it when he pretty much defines the scope as the interception between Importance (value) and Feasibility (effort).

#3 People > Technology

No matter how cool and easy to use the technology is, if you don’t have a skilled team to work on #1 (RTFM and experiment) and #2 (define goals), you will likely end up with a bunch of unattended alerts.

Therefore, don’t hire deployers, hire Security Content Designers, Security Content Engineers, enable them to extract the value of your security arsenal (investment).

#4 Exception handling is not optional

When I say tailor-made, that means your rule should already address exceptions to a certain extent, that’s also called whitelisting.

If during  development you realize a rule is generating too many alerts, try to anticipate the analysts call, and filter out scenarios that are not worth investigating.

The technology MUST provide easy ways to quickly add/modify/remove exceptions. Bonus for those products providing auditing (who, when, why).

#5 Aggregation is key

Have you noticed how many alerts are related to the very same case or target?

Some technologies (and security engineers), especially applicable to SIEMs, dare generating the very same alert – multiple times – simply because the time range considered for processing the events is overlapping, longer than the rule’s execution interval itself. “Run every hour, checking the last 5 days”. WTH?

What about aggregating on the target (or victim, if you will)? Not all products provide such functionality, but most SIEMs do. So instead of generating multiple alerts for every single hit on your data stream, why not consolidating those events on a single alert? Experiment aggregating on unique targets to start with.

#6 Threat Intel data != IDS signature

Here, there’s not much to say, with all that Threat Intel porn hype nowadays, just go ahead and read Alex Sieira’s nice blog post: Threat Intelligence Indicators are not Signatures.

Help spread the love for FPs and share your thoughts!

 

Not everything that happens in Vegas, stays there!

DSCF4009I’m here waiting for my next flight and thought about writing this short post, describing a recent experience I’ve had.

Last week, I had the pleasure to join all Splunkers during our Sales Kickoff (SKO) event in Las Vegas. What can I say? First time in that entertainment world capital, amazing atmosphere, great stories and awesome event.

Besides putting faces to names (or emails), it was a great opportunity to discuss and get instant feedback from a bunch of smart people, which by the way, is one of many  characteristics, part of this big data giant, as people are accessible and open for ideas and (technical) discussions.

Ultimately, all that will definitely not stay in Vegas as the cliche says, but be part of another nice experience within my career that I will keep sharing. It’s been an exciting ride so far at Splunk! Hope to be there next year, wherever it’s going to be!

Think about UX and Security next time you get onboard!

It works! Another title bait. Perhaps it should have been written as “Oslo’s Flytoget: a good UX/Security balance?”. Anyways, since you are here, I hope you enjoy the read.

Besides visiting many places, meeting interesting people and experiencing different cultures, working as a consultant provides you the possibility to face unique human–computer interaction experiences.

I actually started my career as a web designer and since then, I’ve been into this UX thing, so it’s great to spot different User Experience (UX) implementations.

San Francisco’s BART

BART stands for Bay Area Rapid Transit and is probably the most used public transport between SFO and the city center. If you ever been there, you will probably recall its ticket machines from the images below.

Look at how many buttons, slots and signs! That’s scary. My first time there I felt stupid trying to get it working. After a few attempts I decided to step away and check someone doing it correctly (or becoming embarrassed as well).

800px-Barttvm2

But rather than describing how it sucks it’s a struggle to buy a ticket for BART, which seems to be well known, I will simply compare it to another experience I’ve had in another country with similar goal: airport ↔ city ride.

“Wait, what if I use a Clipper card?” Well, check the official video instructions on how to top up and tell me what you think about it!

In case you don’t know BART or haven’t checked the videos, please take a moment to imagine how to operate this thing from the pictures below. And have in mind we are into IT/Computers, let alone elderly and other humans not so tech savvy.

5504887565_a5bf9ae04b

BART’s ticket machine home-screen

DSC_0011

For buying a ticket – after you check the destination’s ticket price on the wall, you should input the exact price by adding/subtracting values from side buttons!

At this point, we should agree the city of Golden Gate bridge – where a lot of startups and great minds are constantly coming up with cool ideas – deserves a better interface for its rail/subway system.

How does Oslo’s Flytoget work?

Basically, you swipe and go.

Well, all you need to do is swipe your credit card at one of the “ticket machines” and enter the train. That’s it. Done. End. No plastic/paper ticket, no ticket gate/ratchet/turnstile.

Apart from the fact BART is located in a country where a lot of people do use cars rather than public transportation (sources: Vehicles per Capita and Public Transportation usage), and that it is not an Express service like Flytoget, I am simply comparing interfaces for a train ticket system.

Here are the pictures from the simplest ticket interface I have ever seen:

IMG_0835-term

Flytoget’s ticketing machine

IMG_0629-iface

Single operation: swipe the card.

IMG_0630-msg

After successfully swiping the card, a green message is shown (assuming red otherwise?)

An additional step is needed after swiping the card, in case you are departing from the airport. There’s a touch screen (image below) where you tap the icon corresponding to your final destination. Since the ticket price is fixed, I guess that’s for Analytics reasons.

IMG_1015

There’s also an app for mobile phones, no swiping  card needed, but I’ve never tried though (perhaps less CC data exposure here?). That’s not an exceptional UX example, but better than most systems being used out there.

Everything comes with a price: Security x UX

How are they handling or storing my credit card data? What about a receipt? How can I expense the cost of the travel journey if my company does not consider credit card reports? Here Security/Privacy might become an issue.

A receipt is available at Flytoget’s website within 24hs after the journey. First, you create an account and then you link your CC number to your profile (!).

Now, needless to say they must be storing some credit card data, likely including parts of the CC number. If you know how it works, please leave a comment below.

It’s easy to suggest we need a balance between UX and Security when there are actually so many variables involved. But IMO, we need to think about the business success first, which is directly tied to UX (way beyond Security?).

If following the rules (laws, regulations, etc) does allow such an option (Swipe and Go), it should be considered. Also, users should know their CC might be exposed since the time it’s shipped, as they should know about refund policy in case of CC theft or fraud.

From the user’s perspective, depriving yourself of those solutions sometimes make little sense. That becomes even more interesting from the UX designer’s perspective, considering most users will not even bother evaluating those risks.

Should we provide an unique user experience (UX) at the price of an increased risk? Or should we provide better Security at the price of an average UX? That’s just one of the dilemmas UX/Infosec professionals face.

UX pros should consider Security as part of their design as we, Sec pros, should consider UX when planning our strategies and actions.

 

Splunkers on Twitter

Below is a list of Splunk users I am following on Twitter, including Splunkers, partners and awesome customers. Most of them are also into #Infosec. The list is not sorted in any particular order.

Missing someone, maybe you?! Please feel free to contact me to add suggestions. In case you want to follow a list, it is also available via Twitter here.

Ryan Kovar @meansec
Staff Security Strategist @Splunk. Enjoys clicking too fast, long walks in the woods, and data visualizations.

Holger Sesterhenn @sesterhenn_splk
Sales Engineer, CISSP, Security Know-How, Machinedata, Security Intelligence, IoT, Industrie 4.0, BigData, Hadoop, NoSQL, User Behavior Analytics

The Dark Overlord @StephenGailey
Towering intellect; effortlessly charming…

Cédric @_CLX
Let me grep you. #infosec and useless stuff. Using security buzzwords since 2005. https://github.com/c-x

Brad Shoop @bradshoop
Security Onion for Splunk app developer, infosec, devops, infrastructure, cloud and homebrewer.

monzy merza @monzymerza
Chief Security Evangelist @Splunk. Thoughts are my own.

Damien Dallimore @damiendallimore
Splunk Dev Evangelist, Golfer, Rugby Player, Musician, Scuba Diver, Thai linguist, Chef.

Adam Sealey @AdamSealey
Information security, both applied and research. CSIRT, DFIR, and analytics Generalist geek. Husband & father of 3. Tweets are my own.

Hacker Hurricane @HackerHurricane
Austin TX. area Information Security Professional

Mika Borner @my2ndhead
Splunk Artisan. Because Splunking is an art.

David Shpritz @automine
I Splunk all the things. Blieve, hon. Splunk, Web App Sec, Open source, EDC

Dimitri McKay @dimitrimckay
Glazed donut connoisseur, plus size hand model, technologist, splunker, replicant, security nerd, CISSP, MMA fighter, zombie killer & lover of pitbulls.

Luke Murphey @LukeMurphey
Developer of network security solutions at #splunk. Founding member of Threatfactor (http://ThreatFactor.com ) and Converged Security (acquired by GlassHouse).

Sebastien Tricaud @tricaud
Principal Security Strategist @Splunk. Playing with data, binary-ascii-utf16-whatever. Opinions are my own, not my employers. Re-tweeting != Agreeing

Dave Herrald @daveherrald
dad | husband | splunk security architect | GIAC GSE | tweets=mine

Ryan Chapman @rj_chap
Security enthusiast. Incident response analyst. Malware hobbyist. Retro game lover. Husband and father. TnVsbGl1cyBpbiB2ZXJiYS4= http://github.com/BechtelCIRT

Michael Porath @poezn
Product Manager for Data Visualization @splunk. Bay Area based Swiss Information Scientist

skywalka @skywalka
my daughter, basketball, hip hop, film, comics, linux, puppet, splunk, nagios, and sensu keep me awake

James Bower (Hando) @jamesbower
Pentester / Threat intelligence / #OSINT / #Honeypots / #Bro_IDS / #Splunk | #Python / Follower of Christ and occasional blogger – http://jamesbower.com

georgestarcher @georgestarcher
Information Security, Log analysis and Splunk, Forensics, Podcasting. Photography and OSX Fan. GnuPGP key ID: 875A3320BD558C9E

Brian Warehime @brian_warehime
Security Analyst | Threat Researcher | #Honeypots | #Splunk | #Python | #OSINT | #DFIR

Michel Oosterhof @micheloosterhof
Splunk // My opinions are my own.

Hal Rottenberg @halr9000
I am the Lorax. I speak for the Developers! @Splunk, Author, Podcaster @powerscripting , Speaker, #PowerShell MVP, #CiscoChampion, husband, father of four!

Jason McCord @digirati82
Security analyst, software developer, #Splunk fan. Log everything. #WLS #DFIR

Matthias Maier @Matthias_BY

Siri De Licori @siridelicori

Challenge your MSSP/SOC/CSIRT: what metrics can they provide you?

I was trying to recall a famous quote related to “Metrics” for including here and below is what Mr. Google hints me:

The quote has a few variations, but that seems to be the most famous one. Perhaps now it will finally stick. So, does it make sense or is it just another unquestioned corporate adage?

Basically, the idea here is to give you more food for thought in case you are into this metrics thing and trying to apply it to Security Operations.

Actually, let me start by saying I like measuring data, therefore metrics is an interesting topic to me. Simply put, translating your effort and progress to management is way easier if you are able to come up with a metric from which they can understand what you are doing and why.

As usual, bonus points if a metric ties to a business goal (more info below). So working on a good, easily digestible metric also saves management time assuming this one is not there only for you, nor can it be allocated quickly. Therefore, selecting key metrics and meaningful charts is an opportunity security practitioners cannot miss in order to keep their budgets flowing in.

many questions, few metrics

How do you evaluate the work done by your SOC or SecOps team? How to verify your MSSP is providing a good service?

Within Security Operations, and I dare using this term to refer to the tasks carried out by MSSPs, SOCs or CSIRTs, you should generate metrics that help or enable answering the following questions:

  1. How many investigations ended up being a false positive (FP) or a real threat (TP)?
  2. From above answers, what scenarios are seen or involved most often? Is there a technology, NIDS signature, correlation rule or process clearly performing better (or worse) than others?
  3. Which analysts are involved in the process of developing or tuning signatures/rules that lead to real investigations?
  4. In a multi-tier environment, which analysts were responsible for the triage of most FP cases?
  5. MSSP only – Are customers responding or interacting with cases that are raised towards their security teams?
linking Metrics to benefits

Now, read question #1 and ask yourself: Do you really believe a properly deployed security infrastructure will never, ever detect a real threat? So why are you still paying a MSSP to provide you with anything but FPs? Checkbox Security?

No wonder why your Snort/Bro guy, with a single sensor is able to provide 10 times more consumable alerts than your 5 super-duper Checkpoint NG IPS Blades? Track answers from questions #2 and #3 to find out.

From #4 you will have a better idea about where to invest your budget for training and which analysts might need some mentoring.

Many incidents evaluated doesn’t mean people are busy on analysis, nor does it mean good work. The higher the FP rate on the SOC escalations, the less interest your customer will have. That indicates less engagement on following up the investigations. Refer to #5.

And what about the relationship with business goals? That’s easier to exemplify for MSSPs: sounding metrics performing as expected are the best ammunition you can bring to the table for contract renewals or (ups!) upselling.

Here are some metrics examples (measurable!):

  • Alerts to Escalations ratio
  • Escalations to real investigations ratio
  • Alerts per shift/analyst
  • Time to triage (evaluate a new alert)
  • Time to close an investigation (by outcome)
  • Number of FPs/TPs per rule, signature, use case

If you embrace Gamification, there are many more that might be interesting, for example: Escalations to real investigations (TPs) ratio per analyst or shift.

No Case Management = No Game

An investigation must have a start and an end, otherwise it’s impossible to measure the output of it. Even if you want to monitor an attacker behavior for a while, this decision (observe, follow-up) was most likely the result of an investigation.

Now, scroll up to the list and ask yourself how many of those questions are easily answered by hooking to the ticket or case management database. Data mining your case management DB might be challenging but definitely worth it.

“I don’t have a case management system!”, then, go get one before you start the metrics conversation. If you don’t have an incident workflow in place, those systems might even drive you towards designing one.

Happy to discuss that stuff further? Feel free to comment here or message me on Twitter.

My TOP 5 Security (and techie) talks from Splunk .conf 2015

indexIf you are into Security and didn’t have an opportunity to attend the Splunk conference in Las Vegas this year (maybe you’re busy playing Blackjack instead?), here’s what you can not miss.

The list is not sorted in any particular order and, whenever possible, entries include presenters’ Twitter handles as well as takeaways or comments that might help you choose where to start.

  1. Security Operations Use Cases at Bechtel (recording / slides)
    That’s the coolest customer talk from the ones I could watch. The presenters (@ltawfall / @rj_chap) discussed some interesting use cases and provided a lot of input for those willing to make Splunk their nerve center for security.
  2. Finding Advanced Attacks and Malware with Only 6 Windows EventIDs (recording / slides)
    This presentation is a must for those willing to monitor Windows events either via native or 3rd party endpoint solutions. @HackerHurricane really knows his stuff, which is not a surprise for someone calling himself a Malware Archaeologist.
  3. Hunting the Known Unknowns (with DNS) (recording / slides)
    If you are looking for concrete security use case ideas to build based on DNS data, that’s a gold. Don’t forget to provide feedback to Ryan Kovar and Steve Brant, I’m sure they will like it.
  4. Building a Cyber Security Program with Splunk App for Enterprise Security (recording / slides)
    Enterprise Security (ES) app relies heavily on accelerated data models, so besides interesting tips on how to leverage ES, Jeff Campbell provides ways to optimize your setup, showing what goes under the hood.
  5. Build A Sample App to Streamline Security Operations – And Put It to Use Immediately (recording)
    This talk was delivered by Splunkers @dimitrimckay and @daveherrald. They presented an example on how to build custom content on top of ES to enhance the context around an asset, which is packed to an app available at GitHub.

Now, in case you are not into Security but also enjoy watching hardcore, techie talks, here’s my TOP 5 list:

  1. Optimizing Splunk Knowledge Objects – A Tale of Unintended Consequences (recording / slides)
    Martin gives an a-w-e-s-o-m-e presentation on Knowledge Objects, unraveling what happens under the hood when using tags and eventtypes. Want to provide him feedback? Martin is often found at IRC, join #splunk and say ‘Hi’!
  2. Machine Learning and Analytics in Splunk (recording / slides)
    If you are into ML and the likes of R programming, the app presented here will definitely catch your attention. Just have a quick look on the slides to see what I mean. A lot of use cases for Security here as well.
  3. Beyond the Lookup Glass: Stepping Beyond Basic Lookups (recording)
    Wanna know about the challenges with CSV Lookups and KV store in big deployments? Stop here. Kudos to Duane Waddle and @georgestarcher!
  4. Splunk Search Pro Tips (recording / slides)
    Just do the following: browse the video recording and skip to around 30′ (magic!). Now, try not watching the entire presentation and thank Dan Aiello.
  5. Building Your App on an Accelerated Data Model (recording / slides)
    In this presentation, the creator of the ubberAgent@HelgeKlein – describes how to make the most of data models in great detail.

Still eager for more security related Splunk .conf stuff? Simply pick one below (recordings only).

For all presentations (recordings and slides), please visit the conference website.

Splunk > Self-Learning Path & The Community Factor

Splunk is gaining tremendous traction in the market due to its ability to harness the value of machine data. The idea here is to highlight a few reasons for such success: free-access and community driven approaches.

Being familiar with the ways in which knowledge can be freely attained is a great advantage. Coupled with your curiosity, pretty much nothing more is needed to become an independent learner these days.

Below you will find the main references I’ve been using to learn Splunk and get up to speed with this great technology.

Splunk Platform: Free, Easy Access

Splunk provides free access to its flagship product, Splunk Enterprise. Users evaluating the product can also get a free, perpetual license. That means no initial costs for installing and evaluating most of its primary capabilities.

For developers, there is also a developer license which enables up to 10GB a day for data indexing.

TLDR? Just hit Play!

Besides the excellent Just Ask campaign, the following short videos help showing Splunk’s benefits:

Are you looking for more technical stuff, easy to follow and digest? Below is a YouTube playlist with demo-like lessons available from Splunk’s channel:

Besides, if you are an Infosec pro, don’t forget to check the current Security related apps at the portal. Aside from that, below you will find a few videos that might trigger inspiration for further research and ideas:

Q&A Forum, IRC and Wiki

The Splunk Answers forum is really an important knowledge base, and here’s why:

  • The discussions are around questions and answers, so entries tend to be clear and narrowed to a specific topic, often times matching an issue you are currently facing;
  • Not only Splunk team members provide answers. It’s common to get responses from partners and, of course, the whole Splunk community, including end-users;
  • Script/Code as well as images are allowed for easier understanding of a question or an answer. Top contributors are also awarded with points and badges to promote users interaction;
  • There is a sort of rating to answers, so users can also rely on that for choosing where to start.

I was also surprised when I joined the IRC channel as several Splunk staff members (PS, Devel, Support) take part in the discussions there. Sometimes the answer not found via documentation, or a bug report might well be the subject of a quick chat.

Besides that, there is, of course, a Splunk Wiki! As it applies to other examples listed here, it’s also community driven so anyone is able to add and edit content.

Documentation Portal

Splunk provides a well organized documentation portal, which serves as a quick reference guide (e.g., search commands) and also enables you to learn about more advanced topics such as Distributed Deployment, or the Common Information Model Add-on Manual.

Also, there are some dedicated tutorials available such as the Search Tutorial. I am listing below some doc bookmarks that I am constantly querying on:

It’s worth noting most areas from the documentation portal are provided with a Comments section, from which the answer for your issue might be found, so always keep an eye on that.

UPDATE 9-Mar-15: Also, don’t forget to bookmark Splexicon, a documentation reference that defines technical terms that are specific to Splunk. Definitions include links to related information from the Splunk documentation.

Cheatsheets

For those Splunk Ninjas pros out there who love having those neat docs around, there are some cool versions available for Splunk as well. Some of them are listed below:

The Community Factor: BIG Win!

The community engagement is a huge win in respect to knowledge sharing and as a business strength. Simply setting up a web forum doesn’t enable community integration. In my opinion, here are some of the great initiatives Splunk has been carrying out to accomplish that:

Missing something? Just let me know so I can add them here as well.